AVKS - UPSC CAPF AC CLASSES
The question of whether technology is making us more isolated has sparked considerable debate in our increasingly digital society. Proponents of this view argue that the rise of digital communication, such as texting and social media, has diminished face-to-face interactions, leading to superficial relationships and feelings of loneliness. They highlight how technology can create distractions that hinder genuine engagement in social settings, exacerbating social anxiety and withdrawal. Conversely, opponents contend that technology enhances connectivity, allowing individuals to maintain relationships across distances and find support in online communities. Ultimately, the impact of technology on isolation hinges on how we choose to engage with it, emphasizing the importance of balancing online interactions with meaningful, in-person connections.
The question of whether capital punishment should be abolished remains a contentious issue with strong arguments on both sides. Proponents of the death penalty argue that it serves as a deterrent to serious crimes, delivers justice for victims, and ensures that offenders cannot reoffend. However, opponents highlight the significant risks of wrongful convictions, the lack of evidence supporting its effectiveness as a deterrent, and the moral implications of state-sanctioned executions. They argue that capital punishment disproportionately affects marginalized communities and violates fundamental human rights. As societies grapple with the ethical and practical dimensions of this debate, the conversation around capital punishment raises important questions about justice, humanity, and the role of the state in punishing crime.
The question of whether euthanasia should be legalized worldwide is a deeply divisive issue, raising significant ethical, moral, and personal considerations. Proponents argue for the right to die with dignity, emphasizing compassion for those enduring unbearable suffering from terminal illnesses. They advocate for personal autonomy, suggesting that individuals should have control over their own end-of-life decisions. Conversely, opponents express concerns about the sanctity of life, the potential for abuse, and the impact on vulnerable populations. The debate calls for careful consideration of safeguards and regulations to balance individual rights with societal responsibilities.